1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,181
You’ve no doubt seen plenty of fluorescent lights,

2
00:00:03,181 --> 00:00:05,683
but have you ever seen one like this?

3
00:00:05,683 --> 00:00:08,562
It may not seem all that strange at first glance,

4
00:00:08,562 --> 00:00:13,163
after all&nbsp;there have been plenty of weird fluorescent lamp designs over the years.

5
00:00:13,163 --> 00:00:16,607
But this one’s missing a&nbsp;pretty crucial part:

6
00:00:16,607 --> 00:00:18,964
the electrical connections.

7
00:00:18,964 --> 00:00:24,934
Your typical fluorescent tube has little wires&nbsp;attached to pins which stick out of the glass at each end,

8
00:00:24,934 --> 00:00:28,606
and they connect to electrodes inside the tube.

9
00:00:28,606 --> 00:00:33,869
Those wires are then connected to a ballast and starter which together place a voltage on&nbsp;
the electrodes

10
00:00:33,869 --> 00:00:37,654
to pump electricity through the lamp which makes it glow.

11
00:00:37,654 --> 00:00:41,725
But this… this is&nbsp;just a glass tube.

12
00:00:42,689 --> 00:00:44,459
How’s that supposed to work?

13
00:00:44,858 --> 00:00:47,228
Well, with these.

14
00:00:47,228 --> 00:00:51,341
The tube is designed to&nbsp;be held in place by a pair of…

15
00:00:51,341 --> 00:00:53,752
let’s call them electromagnets.

16
00:00:53,752 --> 00:00:56,809
That’s not exactly the&nbsp;right word which will become clear in a moment

17
00:00:56,809 --> 00:01:03,358
but each one of them is formed by wrapping a&nbsp;wire around a ferrite core several times.

18
00:01:03,358 --> 00:01:06,521
With the help of electronics inside this driver&nbsp;unit,

19
00:01:06,521 --> 00:01:09,966
a high-frequency alternating current is sent through the wires

20
00:01:09,966 --> 00:01:17,173
which then causes a&nbsp;magnetic field to repeatedly form, collapse, and form again inside the ferrite cores.

21
00:01:17,605 --> 00:01:20,610
Now, if&nbsp;you know a little bit about power transformers,

22
00:01:20,610 --> 00:01:26,395
then if we take the tube out of the picture&nbsp;for a moment and look at a core by itself,

23
00:01:26,395 --> 00:01:33,228
then what we’re looking at appears to be a toroidal&nbsp;power transformer that somebody forgot to finish.

24
00:01:33,228 --> 00:01:39,189
See, usually we’d have at least two coils&nbsp;of wire wrapped around one of these cores.

25
00:01:39,189 --> 00:01:44,218
When we run alternating current through the&nbsp;first coil of wire, called the primary winding,

26
00:01:44,218 --> 00:01:48,369
it will induce a rapidly changing magnetic field&nbsp;through the core

27
00:01:48,369 --> 00:01:54,041
which in turn induces a voltage on the other coil of wire known as the secondary&nbsp;winding.

28
00:01:54,407 --> 00:01:58,570
When that secondary winding is part of a circuit, current will flow

29
00:01:58,570 --> 00:02:07,039
and the upshot is that&nbsp;energy is transferred from the primary winding, through the core, and into the secondary winding.

30
00:02:07,039 --> 00:02:11,593
We often do this because the secondary winding will produce a different voltage

31
00:02:11,593 --> 00:02:16,785
when it has&nbsp;a different number of turns around the core compared to the primary.

32
00:02:16,785 --> 00:02:20,844
But here, there isn’t&nbsp;a secondary winding!

33
00:02:20,844 --> 00:02:22,781
It just doesn’t exist.

34
00:02:22,781 --> 00:02:25,936
That is, until I put the tube back.

35
00:02:25,936 --> 00:02:31,415
This&nbsp;lamp isn’t a literal wire, of course, but once I have it enclosed by the core

36
00:02:31,415 --> 00:02:38,357
it&nbsp;does indeed form a loop in the exact same way a single turn secondary winding would.

37
00:02:38,357 --> 00:02:47,499
It&nbsp;looks a little strange because it’s going way over there before looping back to the core, but&nbsp;that’s what it is.

38
00:02:47,499 --> 00:02:53,863
Now, because this lamp is so large, we need a second core positioned on the other end of the tube,

39
00:02:53,863 --> 00:02:57,526
but they’re wired together and so act as one.

40
00:02:57,526 --> 00:03:03,732
When the alternating current being sent through the&nbsp;wires by this driver unit induces magnetic fields in the cores,

41
00:03:03,732 --> 00:03:08,510
those fields then induce a voltage&nbsp;
inside the fluorescent tube.

42
00:03:08,510 --> 00:03:15,518
And, because it’s formed in a loop, that results&nbsp;in current flow which causes the lamp to light.

43
00:03:15,518 --> 00:03:19,555
For that reason, this is known as an&nbsp;
induction lamp.

44
00:03:19,555 --> 00:03:25,477
The actual light it produces is the result of the exact same&nbsp;principle as an ordinary fluorescent tube:

45
00:03:25,477 --> 00:03:33,415
a low-pressure arc discharge is produced by&nbsp;passing current through an ionized mixture of mercury vapor and a noble gas such as argon,

46
00:03:33,415 --> 00:03:38,279
and&nbsp;as electrons collide with the mercury atoms the mercury emits ultraviolet light

47
00:03:38,279 --> 00:03:42,725
which is then&nbsp;converted to visible light by the phosphors coating the glass.

48
00:03:42,725 --> 00:03:48,884
But rather than use electrodes&nbsp;
reaching inside the tube in order to pass current through the gas,

49
00:03:48,884 --> 00:03:54,080
current flow is generated&nbsp;
externally via electromagnetic induction.

50
00:03:54,640 --> 00:03:56,458
Why would we want that?

51
00:03:56,458 --> 00:03:59,120
Well first, it’s&nbsp;pretty cool!

52
00:03:59,120 --> 00:04:07,920
But also this particular lamp has a power rating of 200W and a light output in the&nbsp;neighborhood of 16,000 lumens.

53
00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:15,357
That is unusually powerful and bright for a fluorescent lamp,&nbsp;
especially given its relatively small size.

54
00:04:15,357 --> 00:04:22,731
But brightness, power, and coolness weren’t really the&nbsp;main reasons these appeared - operating life was.

55
00:04:22,731 --> 00:04:28,185
Getting rid of the electrodes would mean getting&nbsp;rid of the weak point of the fluorescent lamp.

56
00:04:28,185 --> 00:04:34,803
In a conventional tube, the electrodes slowly&nbsp;
wear out in a process known as sputtering.

57
00:04:34,803 --> 00:04:40,952
This happens the most at lamp start-up, but sputtering&nbsp;still happens throughout continued operation.

58
00:04:40,952 --> 00:04:44,696
Over time this causes the ends of the tube&nbsp;to darken -

59
00:04:44,696 --> 00:04:53,301
the dark spots are the material which used to be the electrodes, but as&nbsp;it sputters off it becomes deposited on the glass.

60
00:04:53,301 --> 00:04:58,962
That reduces light output&nbsp;slightly 
but the bigger problem is that as they wear away

61
00:04:58,962 --> 00:05:03,022
the electrodes lose&nbsp;their ability to emit electrons.

62
00:05:03,022 --> 00:05:08,794
That makes it more difficult for the ballast and starter&nbsp;to initiate the arc discharge across the tube,

63
00:05:08,794 --> 00:05:15,956
and eventually they will wear to the point&nbsp;the tube is no longer able to start and the lamp has failed.

64
00:05:15,956 --> 00:05:21,042
As the technology developed we&nbsp;got pretty good at making electrodes which could last a good while,

65
00:05:21,042 --> 00:05:26,636
and fluorescent lamps would&nbsp;
typically have a rated life of 10,000 hours.

66
00:05:26,636 --> 00:05:33,140
But if we could do without the electrodes,&nbsp;
the lamp could in theory last forever.

67
00:05:33,140 --> 00:05:37,380
And, well, that’s the point of this technology.

68
00:05:37,380 --> 00:05:42,887
There’s nothing to the lamp 
but a phosphor-coated tube filled with some argon gas

69
00:05:42,887 --> 00:05:47,740
and a pellet of&nbsp;mercury amalgam 
chilling in this little glass appendix.

70
00:05:47,740 --> 00:05:55,907
It has no electrodes to wear out and&nbsp;
this means the tube itself has a theoretically unlimited lifespan.

71
00:05:55,907 --> 00:06:01,412
Nothing truly lasts forever,&nbsp;of course, 
and due to phosphor wear and mercury absorption

72
00:06:01,412 --> 00:06:04,281
these will lose light output over&nbsp;time,

73
00:06:04,281 --> 00:06:12,375
but these lamps have a rated lifespan of 
100,000 hours - a tenfold increase over&nbsp;conventional tubes.

74
00:06:12,375 --> 00:06:20,144
Operating dusk-to-dawn, that would mean this should last nearly&nbsp;23 years before requiring replacement.

75
00:06:20,144 --> 00:06:28,847
Now, obviously, that’s a pretty phenomenal&nbsp;lifespan and so it might be surprising how uncommon this technology is.

76
00:06:28,847 --> 00:06:32,243
I mean, there’s not&nbsp;a whole lot to this thing

77
00:06:32,243 --> 00:06:38,683
and it operates on the fundamentals of electromagnetism that have been&nbsp;understood since the 19th century.

78
00:06:38,683 --> 00:06:45,983
Sure enough, electrodeless lamps which operated via&nbsp;induction had been demonstrated many, many times in the past.

79
00:06:45,983 --> 00:06:49,297
Nikola Tesla was&nbsp;playing with it because of course he was.

80
00:06:49,297 --> 00:06:55,684
But a practical and effective application&nbsp;of the technology was surprisingly elusive.

81
00:06:55,684 --> 00:07:01,865
It wasn’t until 1967 that John Anderson filed&nbsp;a patent for a lamp like this one,

82
00:07:01,865 --> 00:07:08,967
and then it took until 1990 for it to actually be commercialized&nbsp;into a finished product.

83
00:07:08,967 --> 00:07:11,179
What took so long?

84
00:07:11,179 --> 00:07:16,174
Well, despite how simple the overall&nbsp;
idea is on the surface,

85
00:07:16,174 --> 00:07:23,694
it turns out there were a LOT of different problems that needed solving&nbsp;before this could actually become a reality.

86
00:07:23,694 --> 00:07:32,787
For one thing, inducing current flow in&nbsp;a loop of gas, 
even if it is conductive, is a lot harder than a solid metal wire.

87
00:07:32,787 --> 00:07:40,757
To sustain the arc discharge in the tube, the magnetic field generated by the cores has to&nbsp;switch back and forth very a lot,

88
00:07:40,757 --> 00:07:45,712
so the frequency at which this thing operates 
needed to be very&nbsp;high.

89
00:07:45,712 --> 00:07:50,788
You’ll notice the patent 
shows the driver as “converter to radio frequency”

90
00:07:50,788 --> 00:07:56,132
and Anderson&nbsp;lists a preferred 
frequency range of 100 to 500 kilocycles.

91
00:07:56,132 --> 00:08:00,257
That’s almost reaching the AM radio&nbsp;broadcast band.

92
00:08:00,257 --> 00:08:06,901
By 1967 it was relatively trivial to produce high-powered oscillators which ran at&nbsp;that frequency,

93
00:08:06,901 --> 00:08:09,395
but that wasn’t the main issue.

94
00:08:09,395 --> 00:08:12,032
Because of the required high frequency,

95
00:08:12,032 --> 00:08:19,486
wrapping wire&nbsp;around an ordinary iron core 
as found in most power transformers wasn’t feasible.

96
00:08:19,486 --> 00:08:26,512
At those&nbsp;frequencies, the eddy currents which form inside the cores would cause it to get extremely hot.

97
00:08:26,512 --> 00:08:30,272
That’s the mechanism by which induction cooktops work.

98
00:08:30,272 --> 00:08:34,853
But the problem is, that would both limit&nbsp;
the efficiency of the power coupling

99
00:08:34,853 --> 00:08:41,932
and how much power you could feasibly transfer into the tube&nbsp;before the cores started to melt.

100
00:08:41,932 --> 00:08:48,323
This meant ferrite compounds, which are extremely magnetically&nbsp;permeable but not electrically conductive

101
00:08:48,323 --> 00:08:51,656
and therefore don’t form eddy currents inside,

102
00:08:51,656 --> 00:08:55,538
were required&nbsp;for high-frequency power coupling.

103
00:08:55,538 --> 00:09:03,042
They weren’t invented until the 1930’s and even though they&nbsp;were fairly common by the time Anderson filed his patent,

104
00:09:03,042 --> 00:09:05,953
ferrite was still an expensive material.

105
00:09:05,953 --> 00:09:11,260
In fact, that’s the main reason this lamp gets narrower where the cores attach:

106
00:09:11,260 --> 00:09:16,106
making the tube diameter&nbsp;
smaller requires less material in the cores.

107
00:09:16,106 --> 00:09:19,211
But here’s where the story gets a&nbsp;little weird.

108
00:09:19,211 --> 00:09:25,860
Although this patent is nearly a spot-on description of&nbsp;
this lamp both in form and function,

109
00:09:25,860 --> 00:09:30,960
the first commercial products using the&nbsp;technology were very different from this.

110
00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:37,291
The QL line from Philips was the first 
commercial&nbsp;induction lamp and they looked…

111
00:09:37,291 --> 00:09:41,025
pretty much like an ordinary incandescent light bulb.

112
00:09:41,025 --> 00:09:46,701
They&nbsp;weren’t - they were in fact fluorescent lamps which worked by induction similar to this.

113
00:09:46,701 --> 00:09:53,923
But compared to this tube and its external cores, 
they were constructed inside-out.

114
00:09:53,923 --> 00:10:00,182
I don’t have&nbsp;one to show you, but thanks to a donation 
to the channel from Jeff, a long-time Patreon&nbsp;member,

115
00:10:00,182 --> 00:10:05,561
I do have this variation which was manufactured by GE.

116
00:10:05,561 --> 00:10:12,418
This Genura lamp was released&nbsp;in 1994 
and it is designed to replace a reflector flood bulb

117
00:10:12,418 --> 00:10:17,465
but it works on the same basic&nbsp;principle to the original Philips QL lamps.

118
00:10:17,465 --> 00:10:21,794
Here, the discharge tube isn’t so much a&nbsp;tube as it is...

119
00:10:21,794 --> 00:10:23,577
a vessel.

120
00:10:23,577 --> 00:10:28,823
And a single coil, once again in the form of a wire wrapped around a&nbsp;
ferrite core,

121
00:10:28,823 --> 00:10:35,162
protrudes from the base of the lamp into a hollowed-out section of the glass vessel.

122
00:10:35,162 --> 00:10:41,071
This evacuation stem holds the pellet of mercury amalgam which is required to produce ultraviolet&nbsp;light

123
00:10:41,071 --> 00:10:45,178
and it rests inside the ferrite core when assembled.

124
00:10:45,178 --> 00:10:51,399
An oscillator circuit in the base&nbsp;of the bulb sends high-frequency pulses through the wire wrapped around the ferrite core

125
00:10:51,399 --> 00:10:56,310
which in&nbsp;turn creates a rapidly fluctuating magnetic field around it.

126
00:10:56,310 --> 00:11:00,976
That field reaches well inside the discharge&nbsp;vessel.

127
00:11:00,976 --> 00:11:06,086
As the field changes in intensity, current flows through the gas inside,

128
00:11:06,086 --> 00:11:09,681
and our desired mercury discharge occurs.

129
00:11:09,681 --> 00:11:18,552
In this lamp design, the single coil protruding&nbsp;into the vessel produces a magnetic field in a toroidal shape around its perimeter.

130
00:11:18,552 --> 00:11:23,302
That’s why&nbsp;the QL lamps from Philips look a lot like an ordinary light bulb.

131
00:11:23,302 --> 00:11:31,855
It’s not a linear discharge&nbsp;running through a tube but more of a fuzzy donut of ultraviolet light surrounding the induction&nbsp;coil,

132
00:11:31,855 --> 00:11:35,933
which a bulb-shape happens to encapsulate quite well.

133
00:11:35,933 --> 00:11:39,626
The phosphors on the glass convert the&nbsp;UV to visible light

134
00:11:39,626 --> 00:11:45,946
and the result is a compact yet very bright light source with an extremely&nbsp;long life.

135
00:11:45,946 --> 00:11:52,875
The original QL lamps ran 
at 85 watts and had a rated life of 100,000 hours.

136
00:11:52,875 --> 00:12:02,640
Now,&nbsp;this GE lamp isn’t quite so optimistic but that’s likely down to the fact that its drive&nbsp;electronics are built into the lamp itself.

137
00:12:02,720 --> 00:12:05,842
This was sold as a drop-in replacement light&nbsp;bulb,

138
00:12:05,842 --> 00:12:09,067
so everything had to get crammed into here.

139
00:12:09,067 --> 00:12:12,686
And since these are generally&nbsp;
operated with the base facing up,

140
00:12:12,686 --> 00:12:17,138
heat from the discharge 
would rise right&nbsp;into the electronic components

141
00:12:17,138 --> 00:12:21,070
which shortens their operating life, especially&nbsp;capacitors.

142
00:12:21,070 --> 00:12:25,827
The QL line from Philips used an external driver muck like this thing does

143
00:12:25,827 --> 00:12:29,840
and the lamp itself was&nbsp;little more than a glass orb on a stick.

144
00:12:30,400 --> 00:12:33,671
Still, it wasn't quite as simple as it looks.

145
00:12:33,671 --> 00:12:39,243
Because the induction coil was shoved up the middle of the lamp, it gets pretty hot -

146
00:12:39,243 --> 00:12:45,107
particularly&nbsp;in the case of the QL lamps which operated at 85 watts.

147
00:12:45,107 --> 00:12:49,607
This was a problem because as the&nbsp;
ferrite material increases in temperature,

148
00:12:49,607 --> 00:12:55,671
its magnetic permeability decreases which&nbsp;
limited the strength of the magnetic fields it can produce

149
00:12:55,671 --> 00:12:59,699
and thus the amount of&nbsp;power it can send into the gas discharge.

150
00:12:59,699 --> 00:13:04,124
That reduces both brightness and energy&nbsp;efficiency.

151
00:13:04,124 --> 00:13:10,544
Philips solved this by incorporating 
heat-conducting material into the design of&nbsp;the ferrite core’s stem,

152
00:13:10,544 --> 00:13:14,419
which by the way they referred to as the antenna.

153
00:13:14,419 --> 00:13:19,588
From what I can tell&nbsp;looking at patents, GE didn’t solve this at all,

154
00:13:19,588 --> 00:13:26,160
but since the lamp only operates at 23 watts&nbsp;
the induction coil probably never got hot enough to matter.

155
00:13:26,468 --> 00:13:33,120
But another issue with the single-coil designs is that&nbsp;
it require an even higher frequency to function:&nbsp;&nbsp;

156
00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:36,154
around 2.5 megahertz.

157
00:13:36,154 --> 00:13:43,622
And because these are&nbsp;operating at radio frequencies and pumping dozens of watts or more into the discharge vessel,

158
00:13:43,622 --> 00:13:47,779
well radio&nbsp;frequency interference was a significant problem.

159
00:13:47,779 --> 00:13:55,115
To try and help solve it, the glass is coated with a 
transparent yet&nbsp;conductive material, such as indium tin oxide,

160
00:13:55,115 --> 00:13:58,896
which absorbs radio frequency energy and&nbsp;
keeps it from escaping.

161
00:13:58,896 --> 00:14:07,279
And in this lamp, the underside of the discharge vessel also has a metal shield which was&nbsp;bonded to this copper ribbon

162
00:14:07,279 --> 00:14:11,048
that allows the absorbed energy to return to the circuit ground.

163
00:14:11,048 --> 00:14:17,521
But, it’s clear that GE at least 
wasn’t making the strongest promises about its effectiveness.

164
00:14:17,521 --> 00:14:24,399
They warn specifically against using these on boats 
as they could disrupt maritime communications.

165
00:14:24,399 --> 00:14:28,927
And, uh,&nbsp;given that they provided a phone number for interference complaints...

166
00:14:28,927 --> 00:14:32,696
well I think it’s&nbsp;safe to say this was very much a beta test.

167
00:14:32,696 --> 00:14:39,960
Now, it might seem a little odd that&nbsp;
the basic idea for this later design was patented in 1967

168
00:14:39,960 --> 00:14:47,930
yet induction lighting didn’t get&nbsp;commercialized 
until after Philips and GE released their single-coil designs.

169
00:14:47,930 --> 00:14:53,176
But it&nbsp;might make more sense if you consider that these external-coil lamps...

170
00:14:53,176 --> 00:14:56,782
really aren't that&nbsp;different from conventional fluorescent tubes.

171
00:14:56,782 --> 00:15:06,714
In fact, many lower-power versions of this design&nbsp;incorporated circular tubes which look a whole awful lot like a standard circular fluorescent&nbsp;lamp.

172
00:15:06,714 --> 00:15:13,133
They did offer higher light outputs, but the form was still very familiar.

173
00:15:13,133 --> 00:15:23,591
The fact that&nbsp;neither the QL lamp nor this Genura lamp look anything like a fluorescent tube is probably why&nbsp;the technology was first commercialized like this.

174
00:15:23,591 --> 00:15:25,783
Consider the GE bulb:

175
00:15:25,783 --> 00:15:36,258
the resulting discharge&nbsp;inside this vessel produces a compact but powerful 
ring of UV light just under a relatively&nbsp;flat piece of glass.

176
00:15:36,258 --> 00:15:41,462
This meant fluorescent technology could not only 
mimic the appearance&nbsp;of an incandescent reflector

177
00:15:41,462 --> 00:15:49,040
much more faithfully than sticking a coiled tube inside a&nbsp;
fake bulb but it was also much more effective.

178
00:15:49,600 --> 00:15:58,840
This flavor of induction technology was able to&nbsp;create much more powerful 
yet also compact light&nbsp;sources than a linear fluorescent tube

179
00:15:58,840 --> 00:16:02,715
while&nbsp;still offering similar energy-efficiency.

180
00:16:02,715 --> 00:16:07,771
That was compelling enough on its own to&nbsp;
pursue not only for aesthetic purposes

181
00:16:07,771 --> 00:16:14,335
but because it allowed the use of fixtures&nbsp;with 
optical systems that produced much more directional light.

182
00:16:15,405 --> 00:16:18,480
To a point at&nbsp;least - I’ll touch on that more in a bit.

183
00:16:19,040 --> 00:16:23,680
Induction technology also solved one of&nbsp;
fluorescent lighting’s little annoyances:

184
00:16:23,680 --> 00:16:25,576
a slow warm-up.

185
00:16:25,576 --> 00:16:31,388
High-efficiency fluorescent&nbsp;tubes in particular 
only produce a fraction of their light output at first

186
00:16:31,388 --> 00:16:37,479
due to lower vapor pressure&nbsp;when cold 
and thus they can take several minutes to warm up.

187
00:16:37,479 --> 00:16:42,475
This lamp also starts with a lower&nbsp;
vapor pressure and thus reduced light output,

188
00:16:42,475 --> 00:16:45,429
but the warmup time is just a few seconds.

189
00:16:45,429 --> 00:16:52,135
And the large external-coil lamp is similarly quick - 
it’s at full brightness in only&nbsp;10 seconds.

190
00:16:52,135 --> 00:16:59,841
You can actually observe the mercury discharge migrating away 
from the amalgam&nbsp;pellet as the tube heats up and the pressure builds.

191
00:16:59,841 --> 00:17:03,153
But… well, that was at room temperature,

192
00:17:03,153 --> 00:17:06,176
and these lamps were sold to go outdoors.

193
00:17:06,176 --> 00:17:11,714
In fact street lighting is one of the most likely&nbsp;
places you’re going to find these in the wild.

194
00:17:11,714 --> 00:17:15,818
And I live where the outside air sometimes&nbsp;gets colder than a freezer,

195
00:17:15,818 --> 00:17:22,620
so I put this whole thing inside a freezer overnight
 to see&nbsp;how quickly it would warm up from truly cold.

196
00:17:22,620 --> 00:17:28,258
The lamp had no issues starting but, 
like&nbsp;most fluorescent lights in this temperature,

197
00:17:28,258 --> 00:17:35,455
the mercury was barely contributing anything 
and we could&nbsp;see the purple glow of the argon starter gas.

198
00:17:35,455 --> 00:17:41,566
Interestingly it initially did the same thing&nbsp;
where the light output seems to grow from the mercury pellet,

199
00:17:41,566 --> 00:17:48,170
but before long that bright spot&nbsp;disappeared and it all averaged out to a very dull grey.

200
00:17:48,170 --> 00:17:55,880
It took about 10 minutes to attain&nbsp;full brightness 
so it looks like cold-weather performance is only improved slightly.

201
00:17:55,880 --> 00:17:58,743
But at least it had no trouble starting!

202
00:17:58,743 --> 00:18:03,609
Speaking of starting, well now it’s time to&nbsp;come clean here -

203
00:18:03,609 --> 00:18:08,578
I don’t really understand the mechanisms by which these lamps start.

204
00:18:08,578 --> 00:18:14,939
See, the gas mixture in these tubes isn’t electrically conductive until it’s ionized.

205
00:18:14,939 --> 00:18:23,437
The&nbsp;electrodes in a traditional fluorescent tube emit electrons when heated 
and/or when a sufficiently&nbsp;high voltage is placed across them,

206
00:18:23,437 --> 00:18:30,960
and those electrons collide with the gas molecules inside&nbsp;
and ionize them which causes dielectric breakdown.

207
00:18:31,520 --> 00:18:36,139
But with these, all we got is magnets.

208
00:18:36,139 --> 00:18:44,519
The 1967 patent mentions the use of electrodes in contact with the glass that, 
when a sufficiently&nbsp;high voltage is placed across them,

209
00:18:44,519 --> 00:18:49,560
will ionize enough gas inside the tube to initiate dielectric&nbsp;breakdown.

210
00:18:49,560 --> 00:18:53,564
But this device has no such electrodes.

211
00:18:53,564 --> 00:18:59,902
A later patent filed in 1995 describes this device&nbsp;nearly perfectly,

212
00:18:59,902 --> 00:19:08,159
and it even has a diagram which more clearly illustrates the 
rather confusing&nbsp;way the wires are wrapped around the two ferrite cores.

213
00:19:08,159 --> 00:19:17,441
But it also mentions a conductive strip&nbsp;in contact with the glass 
specifically for the purpose of creating ionization points for&nbsp;starting the lamp.

214
00:19:18,708 --> 00:19:22,103
But again, this lamp doesn’t have those.

215
00:19:22,103 --> 00:19:28,389
All the information I could find on&nbsp;how this lamp gets started was quite handwavey,

216
00:19:28,389 --> 00:19:36,264
but my best understanding is that the driver&nbsp;circuitry 
initially sends a much higher than usual voltage through the wires

217
00:19:36,264 --> 00:19:43,093
which produces a strong&nbsp;enough electric field 
that free electrons in the gas mixture are sort of thrown about,

218
00:19:43,093 --> 00:19:45,278
causing&nbsp;some ionization.

219
00:19:45,278 --> 00:19:51,180
Basically it’s the same way that fluorescent tubes 
can start glowing when you hold them near a Tesla&nbsp;coil.

220
00:19:51,180 --> 00:19:56,198
And once some of that gas is ionized 
the discharge across the tube can be completed

221
00:19:56,198 --> 00:20:00,051
after which the driver can switch to its normal operating voltage.

222
00:20:00,051 --> 00:20:05,882
That may also further explain why the internal&nbsp;core lamps were commercialized first.

223
00:20:05,882 --> 00:20:12,341
Based on readings of patents, it was initially thought&nbsp;
that a secondary winding would be needed on the ferrite core

224
00:20:12,341 --> 00:20:16,826
to produce a high voltage capable of initiating a glow&nbsp;discharge,

225
00:20:16,826 --> 00:20:23,981
but that feature seems to have gone away 
once it was decided to use the very&nbsp;high frequency found here.

226
00:20:23,981 --> 00:20:31,787
This patent filed in 1982 seems to suggest that simply by inducing&nbsp;the magnetic field at a frequency of 3 megahertz,

227
00:20:31,787 --> 00:20:37,869
a sufficiently strong electric field is produced&nbsp;
inside the vessel which can ionize the gas.

228
00:20:37,869 --> 00:20:43,280
But I still haven’t gotten a truly satisfactory answer,&nbsp;
here, and would welcome one in the comments!

229
00:20:43,840 --> 00:20:47,683
It might have something to do with the metal&nbsp;
mesh found here,

230
00:20:47,683 --> 00:20:55,298
and a closer look up the middle of this Genura’s discharge vessel 
shows a&nbsp;piece of wire at the top of the evacuation stem.

231
00:20:55,298 --> 00:20:58,764
But truthfully, I gave up trying to find an answer.

232
00:20:59,266 --> 00:21:07,025
So, with their extremely long operating life&nbsp;
and newfound applications for energy-efficient&nbsp;fluorescent lighting,

233
00:21:07,025 --> 00:21:10,961
it might seem strange&nbsp;that this technology is so obscure.

234
00:21:10,961 --> 00:21:15,209
I mean, today we have LEDs and this technology is&nbsp;obsolete

235
00:21:15,209 --> 00:21:24,140
but knowing that back in 1990 we had a lighting technology 
with a lifespan that&nbsp;essentially matches the best LEDs we have today,

236
00:21:24,140 --> 00:21:27,906
you would think it would have&nbsp;taken the world by storm.

237
00:21:27,906 --> 00:21:29,215
Yet it didn’t.

238
00:21:29,863 --> 00:21:30,926
Why?

239
00:21:30,926 --> 00:21:34,411
Was there another one&nbsp;of those light bulb conspiracies afoot?

240
00:21:34,411 --> 00:21:35,966
Yeah, no.

241
00:21:35,966 --> 00:21:42,319
See, here’s the thing - the tech is&nbsp;really cool and opens up some new possibilities,

242
00:21:42,319 --> 00:21:47,317
but not that many and it also came with some&nbsp;significant downsides.

243
00:21:47,317 --> 00:21:49,866
For one, cost.

244
00:21:49,866 --> 00:21:58,372
The QL line of lighting from Philips was very much a&nbsp;specialized 
commercial product and I’ve been having a heck of a time finding original pricing,

245
00:21:58,372 --> 00:22:01,157
but you can bet it was quite high.

246
00:22:01,157 --> 00:22:04,509
Not only had they created a new kind of fluorescent lamp,

247
00:22:04,509 --> 00:22:09,853
but&nbsp;they had to manufacture specialized electronics and the power couplers.

248
00:22:09,853 --> 00:22:15,428
The lighting system really&nbsp;only made sense in 
applications where relamping was an operational headache

249
00:22:15,428 --> 00:22:18,904
or its operating&nbsp;method offered improved safety -

250
00:22:18,904 --> 00:22:26,237
apparently they saw success in the oil and gas industry 
due&nbsp;to regulations concerning explosion-proof lighting.

251
00:22:26,237 --> 00:22:31,077
GE’s take on the technology was sort-of&nbsp;consumer focused,

252
00:22:31,077 --> 00:22:38,697
and the Genura bulb retailed for about $30 in 1994, equivalent to&nbsp;$65 today.

253
00:22:38,697 --> 00:22:44,902
But that’s a pricey light bulb 
especially considering its expected life&nbsp;isn’t all that great.

254
00:22:44,902 --> 00:22:50,829
It’s certainly much better than the 1 or 2,000 hours 
you could&nbsp;expect out of an incandescent flood bulb,

255
00:22:50,829 --> 00:22:55,619
but it was barely an improvement over existing&nbsp;fluorescent technology.

256
00:22:55,619 --> 00:23:01,764
You needed to really, really want fluorescent lighting in this specific&nbsp;form-factor,

257
00:23:01,764 --> 00:23:09,820
and I find it interesting that GE really didn’t bother to explain 
what’s so cool&nbsp;about this technology on the box.

258
00:23:09,820 --> 00:23:13,934
They're just calling this an electronic compact fluorescent lamp.

259
00:23:13,934 --> 00:23:18,399
Which is true but certainly underselling it.

260
00:23:18,399 --> 00:23:25,039
But the biggest issue, and what I think is likely&nbsp;
the main reason this technology never took the world by storm,

261
00:23:25,039 --> 00:23:29,345
is that it’s still fundamentally&nbsp;fluorescent lighting.

262
00:23:29,345 --> 00:23:34,997
Yes it was longer-lived, but it still had kinda meh light quality.

263
00:23:34,997 --> 00:23:39,715
And,&nbsp;because fluorescent lights are very much not point-sources of light,

264
00:23:39,715 --> 00:23:42,925
it was hard to direct&nbsp;the light these emitted.

265
00:23:42,925 --> 00:23:46,876
This 200W lamp was originally housed in this flood fixture,

266
00:23:46,876 --> 00:23:53,882
and while you could point this in a direction, it still casts a very wide beam of light.

267
00:23:53,882 --> 00:23:57,512
I don’t&nbsp;even think you could describe it as a beam.

268
00:23:57,512 --> 00:24:04,945
The QL lamps were more compact, 
but they still emitted&nbsp;diffused light which is difficult to control.

269
00:24:05,040 --> 00:24:07,527
Take street lighting as an example.

270
00:24:07,527 --> 00:24:10,961
I've&nbsp;encountered a few induction street lamps in the wild,

271
00:24:10,961 --> 00:24:17,827
but they all have about as much beam&nbsp;control as a circline
 fluorescent light stuck in the middle of the kitchen ceiling.

272
00:24:17,827 --> 00:24:20,134
Because that’s&nbsp;pretty much what they are.

273
00:24:20,134 --> 00:24:28,632
And the inverse square law means that you can’t place the lamps too&nbsp;high 
above the street or they just won’t offer effective light output.

274
00:24:28,632 --> 00:24:33,528
This ultimately means you&nbsp;need many more of them placed closer together.

275
00:24:33,528 --> 00:24:40,980
High-intensity discharge lamps like high pressure&nbsp;
sodium and metal halide produce all their light in a small arc tube

276
00:24:40,980 --> 00:24:46,792
which allows fixtures&nbsp;with optical systems 
to focus the light they produce into a narrow beam,

277
00:24:46,792 --> 00:24:51,715
permitting the use of&nbsp;fewer fixtures by placing them higher in the air.

278
00:24:51,715 --> 00:24:56,457
And actually, the Genura lamp demonstrates&nbsp;this downside quite well.

279
00:24:56,457 --> 00:25:02,360
While it mimics the basic appearance of an incandescent BR flood very&nbsp;faithfully...

280
00:25:02,360 --> 00:25:03,978
at least from the face of it,

281
00:25:03,978 --> 00:25:08,241
there’s no directionality to the light it produces.

282
00:25:08,241 --> 00:25:16,654
Even a&nbsp;frosted lamp like this produces a somewhat narrow beam of light 
thanks to fact that the filament is placed far down the reflector

283
00:25:16,654 --> 00:25:22,642
and that is very important to both the 
character and effectiveness of the light it produces,

284
00:25:22,642 --> 00:25:25,920
especially when recessed in ceiling can fixtures.

285
00:25:26,560 --> 00:25:30,103
This lamp simply cannot recreate&nbsp;that directional light,

286
00:25:30,103 --> 00:25:36,817
and I would imagine that presented problems from both an&nbsp;
aesthetic perspective and a functional one,&nbsp;too.

287
00:25:36,817 --> 00:25:43,455
It may be the same number of lumens,&nbsp;
but when fired in all directions and not mostly downward,

288
00:25:43,455 --> 00:25:46,897
the room might&nbsp;be underlit compared to before.

289
00:25:46,897 --> 00:25:52,781
And let’s not forget that 
conventional fluorescent&nbsp;technology saw lots of innovation, too.

290
00:25:52,781 --> 00:26:01,329
If any of the lighting nerds out there have been&nbsp;wondering why I never touted the flicker-free light output created by the high-frequency drivers&nbsp;in these things,

291
00:26:01,329 --> 00:26:06,913
that’s because electronic ballasts for traditional tubes did the same thing.

292
00:26:06,913 --> 00:26:09,991
They&nbsp;didn’t operate anywhere near these frequencies,

293
00:26:09,991 --> 00:26:16,494
but they were fast enough for the persistence&nbsp;
of the phosphors to produce truly continuous light output.

294
00:26:16,494 --> 00:26:20,730
That also increased the&nbsp;energy-efficiency of fluorescent lighting.

295
00:26:20,730 --> 00:26:28,119
As a matter of fact, a bog-standard T8 tube is&nbsp;
more energy-efficient than either of these induction lamps.

296
00:26:28,119 --> 00:26:30,370
And then of course there’s the CFL.

297
00:26:30,370 --> 00:26:34,088
Those, too, got&nbsp;electronic ballasts and all the benefits thereof

298
00:26:34,088 --> 00:26:39,605
and they were available in much more modest&nbsp;
power outputs than induction lamps.

299
00:26:39,605 --> 00:26:44,994
Sure, the Genura lamp is a more elegant solution&nbsp;
than sticking a coil in a fake bulb,

300
00:26:44,994 --> 00:26:49,983
but… is its elegance worth the extra cost?

301
00:26:49,983 --> 00:26:53,616
The&nbsp;market clearly decided no it wasn’t.

302
00:26:53,616 --> 00:26:59,795
I mean, this lamp was sold long before the old curly-q&nbsp;CFL went mainstream.

303
00:26:59,795 --> 00:27:07,189
Once we figured out how to make those cheaply, 
small induction lamps&nbsp;like this just hardly made any sense at all.

304
00:27:07,189 --> 00:27:11,925
And when ordinary fluorescent lights already had a&nbsp;10,000 hour lifespan,

305
00:27:11,925 --> 00:27:18,880
well frankly you just had to be extremely committed to the idea of a lamp&nbsp;which could last 20 years without being touched.

306
00:27:19,534 --> 00:27:22,826
That is, if it makes it that long.

307
00:27:22,826 --> 00:27:29,993
The&nbsp;weak point in the induction lamp 
isn't the discharge tube, it's the electronics inside this box.

308
00:27:29,993 --> 00:27:35,812
And while it certainly is possible to produce
electronic circuitry which lasts&nbsp;100,000 hours,

309
00:27:35,812 --> 00:27:39,354
well let’s just say there are never any guarantees.

310
00:27:39,354 --> 00:27:44,366
Honestly props to&nbsp;GE for being so realistic with these lamps.

311
00:27:44,366 --> 00:27:49,831
The QL line from Philips probably had the best&nbsp;
quality drivers of any commercial system

312
00:27:49,831 --> 00:27:53,791
and since they were separated from the lamp they didn’t have&nbsp;
to deal with heat.

313
00:27:53,791 --> 00:28:02,070
But had this tech gone mainstream, we’d no doubt have the same race to&nbsp;the bottom that plagues so many things.

314
00:28:02,070 --> 00:28:04,970
But of course now this is all moot.

315
00:28:04,970 --> 00:28:13,360
The&nbsp;LED has trounced every lighting technology 
that we’ve ever made on energy efficiency,&nbsp;quality of light, and flexibility.

316
00:28:14,240 --> 00:28:18,173
We still have the same race-to-the-bottom nonsense&nbsp;going on, unfortunately,

317
00:28:18,173 --> 00:28:25,108
and it’s not like there haven’t been some high-profile 
issues with LEDs (such as purple&nbsp;streetlights)

318
00:28:25,108 --> 00:28:29,450
but in general lighting is now just solved.

319
00:28:29,450 --> 00:28:30,889
We’re there.

320
00:28:30,889 --> 00:28:34,763
Aside from some cheap&nbsp;builder-grade light bulbs I still have kicking around,

321
00:28:34,763 --> 00:28:39,745
I personally haven’t needed to replace a light&nbsp;bulb in several years.

322
00:28:39,745 --> 00:28:44,122
That’s no doubt helped by the fact that I 
generally only buy high-quality&nbsp;bulbs

323
00:28:44,122 --> 00:28:49,840
and I use dimmers nearly everywhere 
so rarely are any of my lights at full-brightness,

324
00:28:49,840 --> 00:28:50,654
but yeah.

325
00:28:50,654 --> 00:28:53,935
I’m certainly not pining for the days of old.

326
00:28:53,935 --> 00:28:59,246
But luckily our path to get here was&nbsp;
filled with all sorts of wacky nonsense like this.

327
00:29:00,260 --> 00:29:02,855
♫ electromagnetically smooth jazz ♫

328
00:29:03,728 --> 00:29:05,859
And because it’s formed in a loop,

329
00:29:05,859 --> 00:29:12,036
that&nbsp;induced voltage results in current flow which causes the lamp to light.

330
00:29:12,036 --> 00:29:13,416
Except it&nbsp;didn’t.

331
00:29:14,571 --> 00:29:19,596
Probably because… you need to be secured in place.

332
00:29:19,596 --> 00:29:22,982
Hopefully I didn’t just&nbsp;kill ya, that would be very problematic.

333
00:29:22,982 --> 00:29:25,683
For that reason, this is known as&nbsp;an induction lamp.

334
00:29:25,683 --> 00:29:28,867
And I cannot be sitting here with this in front of my eyes.

335
00:29:28,867 --> 00:29:30,887
…chilling in this little glass appendage.

336
00:29:30,887 --> 00:29:33,247
Is that the right one? Nope. I pointed at the wrong one.

337
00:29:33,247 --> 00:29:36,926
I mean, there’s not a not… not a… dada da!

338
00:29:37,520 --> 00:29:43,040
And in this lamp, [glass scraping sounds] 
the&nbsp;underside… that I’m sure sounded horrible.&nbsp;

339
00:29:43,040 --> 00:29:46,394
…have been demonstrated many many&nbsp;times over the past.

340
00:29:46,394 --> 00:29:48,285
In the… in… ugh.

341
00:29:50,000 --> 00:29:52,499
One would have to call this technology...

342
00:29:52,499 --> 00:29:55,307
totally tubular, amirite?

343
00:29:55,730 --> 00:29:57,309
That one hurt to the core.

344
00:29:58,126 --> 00:29:59,175
Both of them, actually.

345
00:29:59,175 --> 00:30:03,046
Hey did you know that Michael used to be a taxi driver?

346
00:30:03,046 --> 00:30:05,403
He switched to a career in science since he only got one fare a day.

